case law air 1964 ker 277 - An Overview
case law air 1964 ker 277 - An Overview
Blog Article
Since the Supreme Court will be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been arrived at, therefore the decision in the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) in the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
It is usually important to note that granting of seniority into a civil servant without the actual length of service virtually violates all the service construction as a civil servant inducted in Quality 17 by claiming this kind of benefit without any experience be directly posted in any higher quality, which is neither the intention in the regulation nor of your equity. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this can be a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; if the parents of your boy or Female never approve of these types of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they might do if they are able to Minimize off social relations with the son or perhaps the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this kind of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady that's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or guy who is a major, the couple is neither harassed by any individual nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who provides this kind of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to undertaking by instituting criminal proceedings through the police against this sort of persons and further stern action is taken against this kind of person(s) as provided by law.
Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, as well as role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release to be a legally identified conviction. Read more
Therefore, this petition is found to get not maintainable and is dismissed along with the pending application(s), along with the petitioners might find remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
Because the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been achieved, therefore the decision in the Supreme Court needs for being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of your Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
PLR is a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
Various judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of a crime does not represent a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in placing the Petitioner's name about the ECL based around the criminal case are inconsistent with founded legal principles. Consequently, this petition must be allowed Read more
, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling on the same type of case.
This Court may well interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding attained because of the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In case the summary or finding is for example no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court may well interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mould the relief to really make it acceptable on the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority cases of administrative law is definitely the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. Over the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified through the decision from the Supreme Court from the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Executing a case regulation search might be as easy as moving into specific keywords or citation into a search engine. There are, however, certain websites that facilitate case law searches, such as:
Summaries of cases that condition the lives of young individuals, making certain a further understanding of justice within the juvenile system. Knowledge that matters, crafted for legal professionals and lovers alike.
156 . Const. P. 1015/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Saleem Jehangir V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's also important to note that neither seniority nor promotion will be the vested right of a civil servant, therefore, neither any seniority nor any promotion can be claimed or granted without the actual size of service on account of vested rights. The purpose of prescribing a particular duration of service for turning out to be entitled to become thought of for promotion into a higher quality, of course, is just not without logic as the officer that is initially inducted to your particular post needs to serve about the reported post to gain experience to hold the next higher post and to provide the public in a befitting fashion.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to the main case, It is additionally a perfectly-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is issue to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.